KAJIAN NORMATIF PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR.21/PUU-XIII/2020 TENTANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH

The purpose of this study is to find out the considerations constitutional court reject applicant's application based on Law No. 4 1996 and position evidence submitted by applicants in case 21/PUU-XVIII/2020 (Evidence P-4,P-5, P-7). This research a normative analyzing or reviewing valid competent statutory regulation be used as basis for problem solving.Case Number which considered judges Constitutional Court that there no agreement between debtor creditor clause breach contract an overmacht/force majeure agreement, stipulated Article 1865 KUH Civil law, but it not included because applicant has never decision regarding coercion accordance with concerning Mortgage 20 paragraph (1) 14 (3) Law, so rejected petitioners' petition. In Case forms corroboration arguments petition follows explanation agreements, Land Rights Certificates Certificates, Analysis N. 18/puu-xvii/2019, implications Court's No.18/PUU-XVII/2019 community all applicable legal provisions. All clear suffered loss provisions